The King James Bible
God promised to preserve His words, and the King James Bible is His preserved word in English. These articles explain why we hold the King James as our final authority, answer the arguments raised against it, and show what is lost when its words are changed.
Start with these
Preserved, Not Re-Inspired: Why We Hold the King James
Posted by Edward Cross on
A defense of the King James as the providentially preserved word of God in English: that God promised to keep His words, that preservation runs through the received stream rather than the Alexandrian text behind the modern versions, and that the King James is final authority for the Body of Christ — preserved, not re-inspired.
The Defenders of the King James: The Question Beneath the Manuscripts
Posted by Edward Cross on
A companion to Preserved, Not Re-Inspired. Beneath the manuscript debate lies a question about God: would He hold His people accountable to His word and leave them unable to know which words are His? This piece weighs the defenders worth reading and those to be read with discernment, and draws the line between preservation and re-inspiration.
Archaic, Not Ornamental — What Is Lost Without the Thees and Thous
Posted by Edward Cross on
The most common complaint against the King James is that its archaic words make it hard to understand. But the thees and thous are not decoration — they are working parts, telling the reader whether God is speaking to one man or to a multitude. Modern English idiom has no second word to mark that, and this is what is lost when they go.
All articles on this topic
One Means One: The Baptism of Ephesians 4:5
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 17, 2026
Paul says there is one baptism. The usual answer is that he means one chief baptism among several. This study tests that reading against every place the word one stands in the Bible, and then against the sentence Paul actually wrote.
Ye Which Are Spiritual — Paul's Word Names a Source, Not a Feeling
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 12, 2026
Ask ten believers what spiritual means and you will get atmosphere, feeling, and fervency. Paul wrote twenty-three of the Bible's twenty-six occurrences of the word, and he never once uses it of a feeling. This article traces what it actually marks — a source and a realm — and what that settles about a brother who has fallen.
Accuracy and Precision Is Not Excess
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 8, 2026
Make a careful distinction from the text and the answer comes back as a prefix — hyper, ultra, too far. Then a verse arrives to enforce it. But Paul never wrote strive not about words, and the sentence used to forbid precision commands it in the very next breath.
Attack the Man, Avoid the Message
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 8, 2026
There is an old way to get rid of a doctrine you cannot answer: go after the man who said it. Scripture answers it plainly. God published His own messengers' failures, kept using them, and never once made a man's record the test of his message. Weigh what was said, not who carried it.
The Faith of Whose Fathers — Why an Inheritance Is Never a Credential
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 8, 2026
A hymn written by a convert to Rome for the Catholic martyrs of England became the anthem of Protestant loyalty to inherited belief, and it travels that easily because it names no doctrine at all. Paul had a faith of his fathers too. He was exceedingly zealous of it, and he counted the whole inheritance loss.
Transformed as the Ministers of Righteousness: The Disguise Is Perfect and the Test Is Doctrine
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 8, 2026
Paul warned that Satan's ministers appear as ministers of righteousness, not as open enemies. This study examines why the counterfeit stands inside the Christian column rather than beside it, why sincerity, results and personal godliness cannot test a teacher, and what Paul actually gives the Body to test him with.
The Fold Is a Place, Not a People — Rightly Dividing the Other Sheep of John 10:16
Posted by Edward R. Cross on September 6, 2026
Who are the other sheep of John 10:16? The dispute turns on a word neither side had stopped to define. Scripture uses fold of a place — something built, entered, left or become — and never once of a people. Define the word and the sentence reads itself: Israel's own scattered, brought back to one fold under one shepherd.
Sorceries Is Not Pharmacy — What the Word Actually Covered
Posted by Edward R. Cross on August 26, 2026
You have probably heard that the word translated sorceries is where we get our word pharmacy, and that Revelation therefore condemns the drug industry. This examines the method behind that claim, why the passages themselves refuse it, and what your King James already tells you without help from a lexicon.